Honest comparison

aiusage vs Portkey

Portkey is a full enterprise LLM ops platform — governance, guardrails, semantic cache, fallbacks across 200+ models. aiusage is lean, BYOK, Claude-first, built to shrink one bill. Same pattern (proxy), different customer.

What each is for

Portkey

semantic cache, 200+ provider routing, SOC 2, enterprise SSO, cost analytics.

aiusage

Drop-in proxy for Claude (and GPT, Grok). One env var, cache + route + 60-90% cheaper. Your keys stay yours. Built-in features (Flywheel, Test Links, QA on Server, Agent) all bill from one runs balance.

The honest tradeoff

Portkey strength: semantic cache, 200+ provider routing, SOC 2, enterprise SSO, cost analytics.

Portkey weakness (for our use case): heavyweight setup, enterprise-priced, your cheap-Claude win is one feature of twenty.

aiusage strength: material bill-cutting, instant setup, per-run pricing.

aiusage weakness: we do not try to be an LLM ops platform — if you need the full Portkey feature set, we will never compete on that.

Pricing side-by-side

ToolPriceWhat you actually pay
Portkey$99/mo minimum + enterprise quotesPortkey tier + your full Anthropic bill on top
aiusagepay-per-run from a single balance, no seat feesOne runs balance. No seat fees. No subscription.

Who should pick which

Pick Portkey if

you're a 100-dev org with a procurement team and compliance needs.

Pick aiusage if

you're a solo dev or small team just trying to pay Anthropic less.

Can you use both?

Yes. Point Portkey at aiusage base URL instead of api.anthropic.com. You get Portkey observability/ops layer AND aiusage caching + cost optimization. Takes one env var change.

ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://aiusage.ai
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=<your existing key>

Stop paying full price for Claude.

$20 free, no card. Works alongside Portkey if that is your jam.

Start free ->

All features - Pricing - Use cases